@Mike - Yep, 500 words is probably better for the search engines - there's a bit more 'meat' to the content then, and more chance to get your keywords in. Doesn't mean people will read all of it, of course :-) Also: self promotion ahoy! In the absence of any 'Digg It' buttons, I'll do this manually: http://digg.com/tech_news/How_Long_is_the_Ideal_Blog_Post
Stuart Brown wrote:
@Mike - Yep, 500 words is probably better for the search engines - there's a bit more 'meat' to the content then, and more chance to get your keywords in.
Doesn't mean people will read all of it, of course :-)
Also: self promotion ahoy! In the absence of any 'Digg It' buttons, I'll do this manually:
http://digg.com/tech_news/How_Long_is_the_Ideal_Blog_Post